| NR
126/1999 25
November 1999
ABA
disappointed by publication of extracts from
draft closing submission
The
Australian Broadcasting Authority is disappointed
that selected extracts from the draft closing
submission by Julian Burnside QC, counsel
assisting the ABA in its 2UE hearing, were
published in todays Sydney Morning Herald.
"The
ABAs commercial radio inquiry is exploring
matters of significant public interest,"
said Mr Michael Gordon Smith, Presiding Member at
the 2UE hearing. "We have gone to
considerable lengths to ensure procedural
fairness to all parties involved. As part of that
process, draft material was provided to the
parties to the hearing for comment in advance of
closing submissions next week. It is regrettable
that extracts of this draft material were
provided to the Sydney Morning Herald. It is also
regrettable that the Sydney Morning Herald chose
to publish those extracts."
"The
ABA has made no decisions or findings in the 2UE
hearing. It will not make any decisions or
findings until all final submissions have been
presented and considered," he said.
Closing
submissions will resume on Thursday 2 December at
10.00 am in Court Room 1, 10th floor, 80 William
St, East Sydney. The pay TV news channel, Sky
News, will provide live coverage of the closing
submissions on Thursday and Friday.
A
copy of a letter sent yesterday to the Sydney
Morning Herald from the ABAs General
Counsel, Mr John Corker, prior to the extracts
being published, is attached.
Backgrounder
24
November 1999
Ms
Anne Davies
Sydney Morning Herald
Dear
Anne
2UE
Hearing
I
refer to our phone conversation of this
afternoon.
I
understand that you have had read to you by
someone parts of a draft of counsel
assistings closing address to the 2UE
hearing.
From
what you have told me it is clear that what has
been read to you is part of material provided to
the affected participants for the purpose of the
hearing and no other purpose.
It is
unsatisfactory that such material has been
improperly passed on.
In
the ABAs opinion it is inappropriate that
such material be published prior to it being
formally presented in public on 2 December 1999
where it can be considered in the context of
closing addresses from other parties. It is
unsatisfactory that particular excerpts from a
draft be published one, where you may not have a
perfect record of what was read to you and
secondly, where the draft may change before it is
finally presented. I can already advise that some
changes have been made to the draft and no doubt
further changes will be made before it is finally
presented.
It is
not as if this material is being withheld from
the public. To the contrary. The public hearing
will be addressed with the final form of this
address next week.
I
urge you to act in the public interest and wait
for this material to become public in the hearing
process. You will than be able to report it in
full and in context and with the benefit of the
qualified privilege against an action for
defamation that the Broadcasting Services Act
provides for.
Yours
sincerely
John
Corker
General
Counsel
What
we do l What's
new l Search l Publications l Contact
us l Home

|